Which of the following would NOT typically require a lawyer to take a case?

The selection of a lawyer to take on a case can depend on various factors, including ethical obligations, professional responsibilities, and personal discretion. When considering the various options provided, it's important to recognize that a lucrative business client does not inherently impose a requirement for a lawyer to take the case.

While financial incentives are often a compelling motivation, lawyers are not ethically required to accept all business clients, even if those clients could provide significant financial gain. Lawyers have the discretion to choose which clients and cases to accept, provided they are not violating any legal ethics rules or obligations. This decision may be influenced by factors such as personal beliefs, the nature of the case, or existing commitments to other clients.

In contrast, the other choices listed typically align more closely with circumstances where a lawyer may have a strong obligation to engage:

• A defenseless or oppressed individual often evokes a moral and ethical duty for lawyers to assist those without means to access legal representation.
• Pro bono work is a commitment many lawyers make to provide legal services without charge to those who cannot afford them, reinforcing the profession's emphasis on providing access to justice.
• Court appointments are mandates from the judicial system in which a judge may designate a lawyer to represent individuals who cannot afford legal representation, thus creating a