Which action is permitted by a lawyer regarding multiple clients with potential conflicts?

A lawyer is permitted to represent multiple clients with potential conflicts of interest as long as they have informed consent from each client. Informed consent means that each client understands the nature of the conflict and the implications of representation, and they voluntarily agree to proceed despite the potential conflict. This principle is grounded in the duty of loyalty and the requirement that clients are fully aware of any situation that could potentially affect the attorney-client relationship.

For representation to be appropriate in situations involving conflicts, informed consent is essential. It demonstrates the lawyer's commitment to transparency and respect for each client’s decision-making autonomy. Moreover, proper documentation of each client’s consent is also important to safeguard against any claims of inadequate representation or breach of duty.

The other options do not adequately address the requirements of ethical representation in the context of potential conflicts. Communicating all details to all clients might breach confidentiality obligations towards each client. Consulting with opposing counsel may not be appropriate in this context, especially if it involves sharing sensitive client information without consent. Offering a discount on legal fees does not mitigate conflict issues nor does it align with ethical requirements regarding informed consent.