What would be a characteristic of a "Should" question in MPRE?

A "Should" question in the MPRE typically invites a consideration of best practices or recommended actions that lawyers should take in various situations. The correct answer corresponds with the idea of proper pursuit, which aligns with the broader ethical obligations that guide lawyers in their professional conduct.

This type of question emphasizes actions that are advisable or would lead to the most ethical and responsible outcomes, suggesting that the option reflects a recommended course of action rather than a mandatory requirement. The phrasing "properly pursued" indicates that the lawyer should assess the appropriateness of a given action in the context of their ethical duties, distinguishing it from more rigid obligations that are expressly required.

In contrast, other choices focus on absolutes or prohibitions (such as avoiding a particular action) or concepts that may not reflect ethical imperatives, like those referring to beneficial outcomes or mandatory actions. These concepts may be relevant in an ethical analysis but do not encapsulate the nuanced considerations typically involved in a "Should" question.