What is the consequence for a former judge or government employee who takes matters they previously handled?

A former judge or government employee is generally prohibited from representing clients in matters they previously handled or personally participated in while in public service, unless they obtain informed consent from all affected parties. This rule is rooted in the ethical obligations to maintain the integrity of the legal system and to avoid conflicts of interest.

The rationale behind this prohibition is to prevent any potential unfair advantage that could arise from possessing confidential information or insights gained during their time as a judge or government staff. Such an advantage could undermine public trust in the judiciary and the legal profession. Informed consent ensures that all parties are aware of the potential conflicts and voluntarily choose to proceed despite them, safeguarding the fairness of the judicial process.

This standard reflects the broader legal principles surrounding conflicts of interest, ensuring that the actions of those in positions of public trust do not compromise their responsibilities to the justice system.