What does implied authorization allow lawyers to do regarding client information?

Implied authorization allows lawyers to communicate with others to promote settlement as part of their representation of the client. This concept recognizes that certain actions may be necessary for a lawyer to effectively advocate for a client's interests, particularly in negotiation settings.

When representing a client, a lawyer often engages in discussions with opposing parties, mediators, or other relevant figures to facilitate the resolution of a case. Implied authorization provides the necessary latitude for these communications without requiring explicit consent from the client for each individual conversation. This is crucial for effective legal practice, as negotiations often require timely and flexible communication to reach favorable outcomes for clients.

The other options do not reflect the typical scope of implied authorization. Sharing confidential information with the public would violate a lawyer's duty to maintain client confidentiality. Similarly, negotiating settlements without client approval or changing the terms of representation without consent would undermine the fundamental principle of client autonomy in legal decision-making. Clients should be involved in significant decisions affecting their cases. Hence, the correct understanding of implied authorization pertains to promoting settlement communications in a way that aligns with the attorney's duty to their client.