What condition must be met to represent clients with potential conflicts?

To represent clients with potential conflicts, the lawyer must believe there will be no adverse effect on their ability to represent each client competently and diligently. This requirement stems from the duty of loyalty a lawyer owes to each client. The attorney must assess whether the representation of one client could adversely affect another client’s interests.

If a conflict arises, the attorney is required to disclose it to all affected clients and obtain their informed consent to continue the representation. This is in line with the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which emphasize the importance of maintaining professional integrity while managing conflicts of interest.

The other conditions mentioned do not adequately address the ethical requirements surrounding conflicts of interest. For instance, having prior experience with cases (as suggested in one of the options) does not mitigate potential conflicts. Similarly, requiring unanimous agreement among clients on every decision could be impractical and not necessarily relevant to the issue of conflicts of interest. Lastly, the idea that the lawyer must be the only attorney involved is not a requirement; multiple attorneys can represent clients if they navigate potential conflicts properly. Thus, believing there will be no adverse effect is the central criteria for managing conflicts in representation.