In what situation can lawyers who are related represent adverse parties?

The correct answer pertains to the scenario when the rule of imputation can be overridden, reflecting the ethics governing conflicts of interest for lawyers who are related. In general, the rule of imputation states that a conflict of interest for one lawyer in a firm is imputed to other lawyers in the same firm, creating an assumption that all lawyers share the conflict.

However, exceptions exist, such as when all affected parties provide informed consent regarding the conflict. In certain jurisdictions, the imputed conflict can sometimes be overridden if the related lawyers can ensure that their personal relationship does not interfere with their professional obligations and the representation remains unaffected by their familial ties. This means if the lawyers can demonstrate that they can adequately represent their respective clients without compromising professional ethics, the prohibition might not apply.

This principle emphasizes the importance of informed consent and the ability of lawyers to manage their conflicts responsibly. It allows for the potential of representation of adverse parties under strict compliance with ethical standards, provided that both clients are fully aware and agree to the situation.